State Ex Rel. Lippard v. Roseman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State Ex Rel. Lippard v. Roseman

70 N.C. 34

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedJanuary 5, 1874

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 70 N.C. 34 (State Ex Rel. Lippard v. Roseman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Lippard v. Roseman, 70 N.C. 34 (N.C. 1874).

Pincite

Opinion

ByNUM, J.

The facts of this case do not materially differ 'from those stated in the opinion of the Court in the preceding case of Armfield v. Brown.

*35 As we there held that ch. §9, sec. 2, of the acts of 1866-’67 by virtue of which, a trial 'by jury was demanded, had been .repealed, that case is decisive of this and for the reasons there ■stated, the judgment ef the Coart below is affirmed.

The case is remanded, to be proceeded with, according to the course of the Court.

Pee Cttkiak. Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ByNUM, J.

The facts of this case do not materially differ 'from those stated in the opinion of the Court in the preceding case of Armfield v. Brown.

*35 As we there held that ch. §9, sec. 2, of the acts of 1866-’67 by virtue of which, a trial 'by jury was demanded, had been .repealed, that case is decisive of this and for the reasons there ■stated, the judgment ef the Coart below is affirmed.

The case is remanded, to be proceeded with, according to the course of the Court.

Pee Cttkiak. Judgment accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 N.C. 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-lippard-v-roseman-nc-1874.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack