State ex rel. Liposchak v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Liposchak v. Indus. Comm.

646 N.E.2d 465, 71 Ohio St. 3d 1489

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 9, 1995

Docket95-391

StatusPublished

This text of 646 N.E.2d 465 (State ex rel. Liposchak v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Liposchak v. Indus. Comm., 646 N.E.2d 465, 71 Ohio St. 3d 1489 (Ohio 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s motion for issuance of an alternative writ,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause shall be expedited and no oral argument shall be scheduled.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that an alternative writ be, and hereby is, granted, and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present on or before March 23, 1995; relator shall [1490]*1490file his brief within seven days after the filing of evidence; and respondents shall file their brief(s) within seven days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator shall file his reply brief, if any, within three days after the filing of respondents’ brief(s).

Wright and Cook, JJ., dissent and would dismiss the cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s motion for issuance of an alternative writ,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause shall be expedited and no oral argument shall be scheduled.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that an alternative writ be, and hereby is, granted, and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present on or before March 23, 1995; relator shall [1490]*1490file his brief within seven days after the filing of evidence; and respondents shall file their brief(s) within seven days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator shall file his reply brief, if any, within three days after the filing of respondents’ brief(s).

Wright and Cook, JJ., dissent and would dismiss the cause.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

646 N.E.2d 465, 71 Ohio St. 3d 1489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-liposchak-v-indus-comm-ohio-1995.