Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State ex rel. Linndale v. Teske

State ex rel. Linndale v. Teske

655 N.E.2d 736, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1415, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 2725
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 18, 1995·No. 94-2181·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

In Mandamus. Sua sponte, cause dismissed because an action for declaratory judgment is here an adequate remedy at law.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Wright and Resnick, JJ., dissent and would grant the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Linndale v. Teske, 655 N.E.2d 736, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1415, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 2725 (Ohio 1995).

655 N.E.2d 736 (State ex rel. Linndale v. Teske) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. McGrath v. Gilligan, Unpublished Decision (2-16-2005)
2005 Ohio 619 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)
State ex rel. Satow v. Gausse-Milliken
98 Ohio St. 3d 479 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)
State ex rel. Crobaugh v. White
2001 Ohio 102 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
State ex rel. Grendell v. Davidson
1999 Ohio 130 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)