State Ex Rel. Lindsay v. Stephens

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State Ex Rel. Lindsay v. Stephens

25 N.C. 92

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedDecember 5, 1842

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 25 N.C. 92 (State Ex Rel. Lindsay v. Stephens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Lindsay v. Stephens, 25 N.C. 92 (N.C. 1842).

Pincite

Opinion

Daniel, J.

The reasons given by the judge, who tried the cause in the Superior Court, are, in our opinion, correct, and we adopt them. He might have made his charge still stronger for the relator, as it appears that the constable had actually obtained judgments in the name of the relator on the twomotes. Why then did he not collect those judgments ? The judgment, we think, must be affirmed.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniel, J.

The reasons given by the judge, who tried the cause in the Superior Court, are, in our opinion, correct, and we adopt them. He might have made his charge still stronger for the relator, as it appears that the constable had actually obtained judgments in the name of the relator on the twomotes. Why then did he not collect those judgments ? The judgment, we think, must be affirmed.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 N.C. 92, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-lindsay-v-stephens-nc-1842.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack