State ex rel. Lightfritz v. Ogle
This text of 172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 236 (State ex rel. Lightfritz v. Ogle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Section 2953.03, Revised Code, provides, in part, that “on application by or on behalf of a defendant, after judgment * * * to the clerk of court * * # such officer shall make and cause to be delivered to the clerk of the reviewing court to which the appeal is taken * * * a complete certified transcript of the record.” The section provides also for a bill of exceptions in a felony case, the cost of which bill may be paid out of the county treasury because of the poverty of the defendant.
It is apparent that no appeal by relator is now pending. The relief sought here is available, according to the plain language of the above-quoted statute, only where an appeal is pending.
The writ of mandamus is denied.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-lightfritz-v-ogle-ohio-1961.