State ex rel. Lightfritz v. Ogle

172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 236
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 10, 1961
DocketNo. 36296
StatusPublished

This text of 172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 236 (State ex rel. Lightfritz v. Ogle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Lightfritz v. Ogle, 172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 236 (Ohio 1961).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Section 2953.03, Revised Code, provides, in part, that “on application by or on behalf of a defendant, after judgment * * * to the clerk of court * * # such officer shall make and cause to be delivered to the clerk of the reviewing court to which the appeal is taken * * * a complete certified transcript of the record.” The section provides also for a bill of exceptions in a felony case, the cost of which bill may be paid out of the county treasury because of the poverty of the defendant.

It is apparent that no appeal by relator is now pending. The relief sought here is available, according to the plain language of the above-quoted statute, only where an appeal is pending.

The writ of mandamus is denied.

Writ denied.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Radcliee and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Radcliee, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-lightfritz-v-ogle-ohio-1961.