Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State ex rel. Licking Cty. v. Licking Mem. Hosp

State ex rel. Licking Cty. v. Licking Mem. Hosp

700 N.E.2d 877, 83 Ohio St. 3d 1459, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 2986
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 19, 1998
Docket98-1733
StatusPublished

This text of 700 N.E.2d 877 (State ex rel. Licking Cty. v. Licking Mem. Hosp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Licking Cty. v. Licking Mem. Hosp, 700 N.E.2d 877, 83 Ohio St. 3d 1459, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 2986 (Ohio 1998).

Opinion

98-1733.

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. On October 5,1998, respondent filed a motion for leave to file a reply to relators’ memorandum contra respondent’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. Whereas S.CtPrae.R. XI(4) prohibits a reply to a memorandum opposing a motion,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave to file a reply to relators’ memorandum contra respondent’s motion for judgment on the pleadings be, and hereby is, denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
700 N.E.2d 877, 83 Ohio St. 3d 1459, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 2986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-licking-cty-v-licking-mem-hosp-ohio-1998.