State ex rel. Libecap v. Indus. Comm.

1998 Ohio 120, 83 Ohio St. 3d 178
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 23, 1998·No. 1996-2352·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 178.]

THE STATE EX REL. LIBECAP, APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLANTS.

[Cite as State ex rel. Libecap v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-120.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 96-2352—Submitted July 8, 1998—Decided September 23, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 96APD01-29. __________________ Hochman & Roach Co., L.P.A., and Gary D. Plunkett, for appellee. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Steven P. Fixler, Assistant Attorney General, for appellants. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur. MOYER, C.J., dissents. COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. COOK, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Libecap v. Indus. Comm., 1998 Ohio 120, 83 Ohio St. 3d 178 (Ohio 1998).

1998 Ohio 120 (State ex rel. Libecap v. Indus. Comm.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, 07ap-391 (4-17-2008)
2008 Ohio 1836 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)