State Ex Rel. Lezer v. Tahash

128 N.W.2d 708, 268 Minn. 571, 1964 Minn. LEXIS 745
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided May 22, 1964·No. 39,421·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On February 27, 1964, relator appealed to this court from an order of the Washington County District Court discharging a writ of habeas corpus issued to review the legality of his detention in the State Prison under a sentence following his conviction of third-degree forgery. On May 13, 1964, relator was discharged from the custody of the respondent warden, according to notice received by the clerk of this court.

It is a well-established rule that courts will decide only actual controversies and that an appellate court, when an event has occurred which renders it impossible to grant any effectual relief, will dismiss the appeal. Relator’s discharge renders it impossible for this court to grant him any relief from the order from which he appealed. The questions involved are now moot.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Lezer v. Tahash, 128 N.W.2d 708, 268 Minn. 571, 1964 Minn. LEXIS 745 (Mich. 1964).

128 N.W.2d 708 (State Ex Rel. Lezer v. Tahash) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Brooks
604 N.W.2d 345 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2000)
Matter of Schmidt
443 N.W.2d 824 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1989)
McIntosh v. Davis
441 N.W.2d 115 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1989)
State Ex Rel. Meldahl v. Tahash
153 N.W.2d 147 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1967)
State Ex Rel. Atkinson v. Tahash
142 N.W.2d 294 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1966)