State Ex Rel. Leyba v. District Court of Fourth Judicial Dist.

New Mexico Supreme Court

State Ex Rel. Leyba v. District Court of Fourth Judicial Dist.

270 P. 797, 33 N.M. 527

CourtNew Mexico Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 10, 1928

DocketNo. 3397.

StatusPublished

This text of 270 P. 797 (State Ex Rel. Leyba v. District Court of Fourth Judicial Dist.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Leyba v. District Court of Fourth Judicial Dist., 270 P. 797, 33 N.M. 527 (N.M. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

A proceeding having been instituted under the provisions of chapter 36, Laws of 1909 (Code of 1915, §§ 3955-3983), for the removal of a county commissioner of San Miguel county, citation was served, in the absence of the accused, by delivering a copy to a person over fifteen years of age residing at the usual place of abode of the accused. A motion to quash this service was overruled by the district judge. Whereupon application was made to this court for a writ of prohibition against further proceedings.

The sufficiency of the service being the only question involved, and the matter having been fully argued by counsel for both parties, and the court being of opinion that such service is authorized by Code 1915, § 4532, the application is denied.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

A proceeding having been instituted under the provisions of chapter 36, Laws of 1909 (Code of 1915, §§ 3955-3983), for the removal of a county commissioner of San Miguel county, citation was served, in the absence of the accused, by delivering a copy to a person over fifteen years of age residing at the usual place of abode of the accused. A motion to quash this service was overruled by the district judge. Whereupon application was made to this court for a writ of prohibition against further proceedings.

The sufficiency of the service being the only question involved, and the matter having been fully argued by counsel for both parties, and the court being of opinion that such service is authorized by Code 1915, § 4532, the application is denied.

It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

270 P. 797, 33 N.M. 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-leyba-v-district-court-of-fourth-judicial-dist-nm-1928.