State ex rel. Levine v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Levine v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp.

942 N.E.2d 380, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1406

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 25, 2011·No. 2010-2283·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s application for dismissal, it is ordered by the court that the application for dismissal is granted. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.

Upon consideration of respondent’s motion to strike relator’s memo opposing the motion for judgment on the pleadings as having been untimely filed, it is ordered by the court that the motion is denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s application for dismissal, it is ordered by the court that the application for dismissal is granted. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.

Upon consideration of respondent’s motion to strike relator’s memo opposing the motion for judgment on the pleadings as having been untimely filed, it is ordered by the court that the motion is denied as moot.

State ex rel. Levine v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp., 942 N.E.2d 380, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1406 (Ohio 2011).

Pincite

942 N.E.2d 380 (State ex rel. Levine v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.