State ex rel. Leu v. Coffey

148 N.W. 664, 28 N.D. 329, 1914 N.D. LEXIS 112
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 25, 1914
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 148 N.W. 664 (State ex rel. Leu v. Coffey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Leu v. Coffey, 148 N.W. 664, 28 N.D. 329, 1914 N.D. LEXIS 112 (N.D. 1914).

Opinion

Pee Oueiam.

An alternative writ of mandamus was issued by this court, commanding the judge of the district court of Wells county to entertain jurisdiction to hear and decide a contest involving the nomination, at the June primary, of a Eepublican candidate for representative to the legislative assembly in and for the 33d senatorial district, or to show cause why he refuses to do so. That court entered a judgment dismissing such contest upon the sole ground of alleged want of jurisdiction to hear the same.

Pending this proceeding the contestant appealed from the judgment dismissing such contest, and this court has just decided such appeal in contestant’s favor. See Leu v. Montgomery, — N. D. —, 148 N. W. 662. Such decision in effect disposes of the merits of this-mandamus proceeding, and renders further consideration thereof unnecessary.

The alternative writ is accordingly quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morris v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.
155 N.W. 861 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
148 N.W. 664, 28 N.D. 329, 1914 N.D. LEXIS 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-leu-v-coffey-nd-1914.