State ex rel. LetOhioVote.org v. Brunner

923 N.E.2d 624, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1525
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 25, 2010·No. 2010-0367·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of relators’ motion for protective order, and the motion for protective order and for sanctions of New Models,

It is ordered by the court that the motions for protective order are granted, and the motion for sanctions will be considered at the time of the merits determination.

Pfeifer, J., dissents and would deny the motions for protective order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. LetOhioVote.org v. Brunner, 923 N.E.2d 624, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1525 (Ohio 2010).

923 N.E.2d 624 (State ex rel. LetOhioVote.org v. Brunner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. LetOhioVote.org v. Brunner
2010 Ohio 1895 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)