State ex rel. Lehman v. Poulos
This text of 721 N.E.2d 1067 (State ex rel. Lehman v. Poulos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In Prohibition. On December 23, 1999, relator filed a document titled “Petition for Writ of Prohibition.” S.Ct.Prac.R. IX(4) requires that an original action shall be instituted by the filing of a complaint containing a specific statement of facts upon which the claim for relief is based and supported by an affidavit of relator specifying the details of the claim. The affidavit attached to relator’s “petition” does not attest to the details of the claim. Whereas relator has not met the requirements of S.Ct.Prac.R. IX(4) for instituting an original action,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this case be, and hereby is, dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
721 N.E.2d 1067, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1482, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-lehman-v-poulos-ohio-1999.