State ex rel. Lee v. State
Opinion
In re Lee, Timothy; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Charles, 29th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 02-0539; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 04-KH-391.
Writ granted. Though the guilty plea form and Boykin transcript, reveal that all parties believed that relator could participate in the Impact Program, because relator committed a crime of violence, he may not. R.S. 15:574.4(A)(2)(a); R.S. 14:2(13)(s). Accordingly, because prospect of participation in the Impact Program with accelerated release on sentence was a material inducement for relator’s plea, the guilty plea is vacated and the case remanded to the district court for further proceedings. See State v. Galliano, 396 So.2d 1288, 1291 (La.1981).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
904 So. 2d 695 (State ex rel. Lee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.