State ex rel. Lee v. State

904 So. 2d 695, 2005 La. LEXIS 1985, 2005 WL 1639072
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 17, 2005·No. No. 2004-KH-1376·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In re Lee, Timothy; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Charles, 29th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 02-0539; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 04-KH-391.

Writ granted. Though the guilty plea form and Boykin transcript, reveal that all parties believed that relator could participate in the Impact Program, because relator committed a crime of violence, he may not. R.S. 15:574.4(A)(2)(a); R.S. 14:2(13)(s). Accordingly, because prospect of participation in the Impact Program with accelerated release on sentence was a material inducement for relator’s plea, the guilty plea is vacated and the case remanded to the district court for further proceedings. See State v. Galliano, 396 So.2d 1288, 1291 (La.1981).

TRAYLOR, J., would deny the writ. KNOLL, J., would deny the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Lee v. State, 904 So. 2d 695, 2005 La. LEXIS 1985, 2005 WL 1639072 (La. 2005).

904 So. 2d 695 (State ex rel. Lee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Heath
76 So. 3d 84 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2011)
State v. Fontenot
934 So. 2d 935 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2006)