State ex rel. Lee v. Quinlan

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Lee v. Quinlan

517 So. 2d 143, 1988 La. LEXIS 117, 1988 WL 1874

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 11, 1988

DocketNo. 87-KH-2356

StatusPublished

This text of 517 So. 2d 143 (State ex rel. Lee v. Quinlan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Lee v. Quinlan, 517 So. 2d 143, 1988 La. LEXIS 117, 1988 WL 1874 (La. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Lee, Adolph F.; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “B”, No. 255-150.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application for a writ of habeas corpus and motion to recuse he filed on August 6, 1987. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application and motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Lee, Adolph F.; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “B”, No. 255-150.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application for a writ of habeas corpus and motion to recuse he filed on August 6, 1987. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application and motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

517 So. 2d 143, 1988 La. LEXIS 117, 1988 WL 1874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-lee-v-quinlan-la-1988.