State ex rel. Lay v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Lay v. State

617 So. 2d 923, 1993 La. LEXIS 1741, 1993 WL 157410

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 14, 1993

DocketNo. 92-KH-1988

StatusPublished

This text of 617 So. 2d 923 (State ex rel. Lay v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Lay v. State, 617 So. 2d 923, 1993 La. LEXIS 1741, 1993 WL 157410 (La. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Lay, Richard; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, Nos. 130,364, 131,-275; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW92 1079.

[924]*924Not considered. The records indicate relator’s inability to satisfy the ‘custody’ requirement of La.C.Cr.P. art. 924, and relator has failed to sufficiently establish that he meets this requirement so as to warrant this Court’s consideration of his claim.

LEMMON, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Lay, Richard; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, Nos. 130,364, 131,-275; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW92 1079.

[924]*924Not considered. The records indicate relator’s inability to satisfy the ‘custody’ requirement of La.C.Cr.P. art. 924, and relator has failed to sufficiently establish that he meets this requirement so as to warrant this Court’s consideration of his claim.

LEMMON, J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

617 So. 2d 923, 1993 La. LEXIS 1741, 1993 WL 157410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-lay-v-state-la-1993.