State ex rel. Laulo v. Selsor
This text of 44 S.W.3d 882 (State ex rel. Laulo v. Selsor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Appellants, members of Citizens to Incorporate Imperial, appeal from the judgment of the trial court affirming the County Commission of Jefferson County’s (“Commission”) order denying Appellants’ petition to incorporate the City of Imperial. Appellants contend the trial court erred in 1 (1) treating the case as a plenary exercise of its original jurisdiction rather than as a case for direct administrative review under Section 536.150 RSMo. (1994)2 because under the latter approach the court is allowed to examine the entire record of proceedings before the Commission; (2) ruling that the Commission’s order is valid and enforceable because Section 72.130 on which the order is based does not apply in this case; (3) ruling that the Commission’s order is valid and enforceable because Appellants fulfilled the requirements of Section 72.080.1 for incorporating a city; and (4) ruling that the Commission’s order is valid and enforceable because the doctrine of prior jurisdiction gives the Commission exclusive jurisdiction to enforce 72.080.1 and as such the Commission should have ordered an election to be held.
We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
We affirm the judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 S.W.3d 882, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 610, 2001 WL 345656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-laulo-v-selsor-moctapp-2001.