State Ex Rel. Lathan v. Jensen, L-07-1112 (5-18-2007)
This text of 2007 Ohio 2536 (State Ex Rel. Lathan v. Jensen, L-07-1112 (5-18-2007)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
{¶ 2} On April 2, 2007, relator filed a petition for a writ of procedendo requesting a court order directing respondent to compel the "bureau of sentence computation" to *Page 2 remove three years from relator's sentence which he argues are in excess of the actual sentence imposed by the trial court.
{¶ 3} On April 9, 2007, respondent issued an order denying relator's motion to compel the "bureau of sentence computation" to delete three years from relator's sentence. In support of its denial of relator's motion, the respondent noted that relator was convicted of aggravated robbery with a firearm specification in case No. CR98-2941. The mandatory three year term of incarceration for that firearm specification was ordered to run consecutive to relator's sentence in case No. CR03-1194, which did not include a firearm specification. Accordingly, the trial court denied relator's motion to compel.
{¶ 4} We find relator's petition for writ of procedendo moot in light of the trial court order disposing of the issues underlying same dated April 9, 2007.
{¶ 5} Wherefore, we find respondent's motion to dismiss well-taken and hereby grant same. Relator is hereby ordered to pay the costs. It is so ordered.
MOTION GRANTED.
Mark L. Pietrykowski P.J., Arlene Singer, J., and Thomas J. Osowik, J., concur. *Page 1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2007 Ohio 2536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-lathan-v-jensen-l-07-1112-5-18-2007-ohioctapp-2007.