State ex rel. Lanter v. Rush Circuit Court

146 N.E.2d 826, 237 Ind. 705, 1958 Ind. LEXIS 195
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 9, 1958
DocketNo. 0-504
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 146 N.E.2d 826 (State ex rel. Lanter v. Rush Circuit Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Lanter v. Rush Circuit Court, 146 N.E.2d 826, 237 Ind. 705, 1958 Ind. LEXIS 195 (Ind. 1958).

Opinion

Per Curiam

Relator seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the Rush Circuit Court to grant his petition to modify a judgment entered against him on or about December 20th, 1947; and an alternative writ directed to such court and the Judge thereof requiring him to show cause why he (relator) should not be discharged.

The petition herein shows on its face that the petition to modify was denied and overruled, and if error was committed in so doing relator’s remedy was by appeal from the final order denying such petition (Rule 2-40B of this court) and not by petition for writ of mandamus in this court. Hence the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

The petition for an alternative writ is denied for want of jurisdiction of the subject matter.

Note. — Reported in 146 N. E. 2d 826.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sutton v. State
221 N.E.2d 430 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
146 N.E.2d 826, 237 Ind. 705, 1958 Ind. LEXIS 195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-lanter-v-rush-circuit-court-ind-1958.