State Ex Rel. Lanker v. Kelsey

186 N.E. 508, 126 Ohio St. 599, 126 Ohio St. (N.S.) 599, 1933 Ohio LEXIS 380
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 10, 1933·No. 24107·Published

Opinion

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that the petition in error in this proceeding was not *600 filed in this court within seventy days after the entry of the judgment of the Court of Appeals on August 30, 1932, which judgment was not vacated, modified or set aside by that court, and therefore the limitation for prosecuting error under Section 12270, (General Code, did not run from the date of the entry of judgment denying the application for rehearing. (Wyant v. Russell, 109 Ohio St., 167, and City of Dayton v. Public Utilities Commission, 111 Ohio St., 476.)

Petition in error dismissed.

Day, Allen, Stephenson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur. Weygandt, C. J., and Kinkade, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Lanker v. Kelsey, 186 N.E. 508, 126 Ohio St. 599, 126 Ohio St. (N.S.) 599, 1933 Ohio LEXIS 380 (Ohio 1933).

186 N.E. 508 (State Ex Rel. Lanker v. Kelsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wyant v. Russell
142 N.E. 144 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1923)
City of Dayton v. Public Utilities Commission
145 N.E. 849 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1924)