State ex rel. Lange v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Lange v. Industrial Commission

98 Ohio St. (N.S.) 459

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 11, 1918

DocketNo. 15792

StatusPublished

This text of 98 Ohio St. (N.S.) 459 (State ex rel. Lange v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Lange v. Industrial Commission, 98 Ohio St. (N.S.) 459 (Ohio 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

The court finds that the money advanced to the relator by The Diamond Alkali Company was paid for and on behalf of all parties in interest, and in order to avoid the delay necessary in the allowance and payment by the Commission, and to meet the [460]*460immediate necessities of the relator. The court, therefore, finds that the relator is not entitled to the writ prayed for, but that the said The Diamond Alkali Company is entitled to the writ prayed for in its cross-petition.

It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that a writ of mandamus issue as prayed for by the said company in its prayer.

Writ denied to relator, but to issue in favor of The Diamond Alkali Co. on cross-petition.

Wanamaker, Jones, Johnson and Donahue, JJ-, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court finds that the money advanced to the relator by The Diamond Alkali Company was paid for and on behalf of all parties in interest, and in order to avoid the delay necessary in the allowance and payment by the Commission, and to meet the [460]*460immediate necessities of the relator. The court, therefore, finds that the relator is not entitled to the writ prayed for, but that the said The Diamond Alkali Company is entitled to the writ prayed for in its cross-petition.

It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that a writ of mandamus issue as prayed for by the said company in its prayer.

Writ denied to relator, but to issue in favor of The Diamond Alkali Co. on cross-petition.

Wanamaker, Jones, Johnson and Donahue, JJ-, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 Ohio St. (N.S.) 459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-lange-v-industrial-commission-ohio-1918.