State ex rel. Landry v. State
207 So. 3d 394, 2016 La. LEXIS 2463
Opinion
| denied. Relator has failed to set forth a valid ground for recusal and therefore shows no error in the lower courts’ rulings. See La.C.Cr.P. art. 671. We attach hereto and make a part hereof the District Court’s written reasons denying relator’s motion.
Attachment
[395] [[Image here]]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Landry v. State, 207 So. 3d 394, 2016 La. LEXIS 2463 (La. 2016).
207 So. 3d 394 (State ex rel. Landry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.