State Ex Rel. Landis v. City of Sanford

152 So. 193, 113 Fla. 750, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1731
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 16, 1934
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 152 So. 193 (State Ex Rel. Landis v. City of Sanford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Landis v. City of Sanford, 152 So. 193, 113 Fla. 750, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1731 (Fla. 1934).

Opinion

Whitfield, J.

In quo warranto proceedings it is sought to have, the municipality ousted of jurisdiction over that part of its' assumed territory which is not included in the description contained in Section 6, Chapter 9897, Acts oi 1923, which is:

“Commencing at a point eighty rods west and eighty rods *751 north of a point where the south shore line of Lake Monroe, in Seminole County, State of Florida, is intersected by the west boundary line of Section twenty-nine (29), of township nineteen (19) south, range thirty-one (31) east; run thence south to the middle of the southeast quarter of Section thirty-one (31) of the same township and range; run thence west to a point eighty rods south of the middle of section thirty-six (36) of township nineteen (19) south, range thirty (30) east; run thence north to the middle of said section thirty-six (36); thence west to the middle of section thirty-five (35) of same township and range; thence north along the middle line of said section thirty-five (35) to the north boundary line of said section thirty-five (35); thence west to the northwest corner of said section thirty-five (35); thence north along the west line of sections twenty-six (26) and twenty-three (23) of township nineteen (19) south, range thirty (30) east, to a point eighty rods north of the south shore line of Lake Monroe aforesaid; run thence southeasterly parallelling the south shore line of said lake to point of beginning; and such territory so bounded shall be and continue to be the Municipal Corporation designated as aforesaid.”

It appears that House Bill No. 713, which became Chapter 11135, Acts of 1925, was introduced and passed by each House of the Legislature with a title to amend Section 8 of Chapter 9897, Acts of 1923, but when the bill was enrolled and signed by the officers of each House and approved by the Governor, it had a title to amend Section 6 of Chapter 9897, Acts of 1923. Section 6 of Chapter 9897 describes the municipal territory, while Section 8, Chapter 9897 relates to the city commission;

The legal effect of the provisions' of Section 16, Article III, of the Constitution is that when a legislative bill is *752 introduced and voted on by the members of the Legislature, such bill shall briefly express the subject of the bill so as to give fair and not misleading notice of the purport of the bill to the public who may be interested, as well as to the members of the Legislature.

In this case, the legislative journals show that the billj which was introduced in the House and which was passed by each House, was entitled, “A Bill to Amend Section 8 of Chapter 9897, Acts of 1923,” which section related to a city commission, while the bill which was enrolled and signed by the legislative officers and approved by the Governor, was entitled, “A Bill to Amend Section 6 of Chapter 9897, Acts of 1923,” which section describes the territory incorporated in the municipality. The subjects of ..the two sections' are wholly different, though both have relation to, and are integral parts of the Municipal Charter Act.

The difference in the section numbers expressed in the title of House Bill No. 173, before arid after its passage, cannot fairly be regarded as an immaterial clerical error; because the title to the bill as' it was introduced and passed was misleading as to the subject of the bill, since, as shown by the .contents of the bill and by its title when it was enrolled and signed by the legislative officers and approved by the Governor, the subject and purpose of the bill was to amend Section 6 of Chapter 9897 relating to the. incorporated territory, and not to amend Section 8 of Chapter 9897 relating to the city commission as was expressed in the title of the bill when it was introduced and' passed by each House of the Legislature. . > *

The necessary result is that because of the misleading1 title, the enactment of House Bill No. 713 which is printed in the s'ession laws as Chapter 11135, Acts of 1925, was in *753 operative under Section 16, Article III of the Constitution to amend Section 6 of Chapter 9897, Acts of 1923.

In 1931 the Legislature enacted three laws now to be considered:

“Chapter 15836.
“An Act to Ratify, Validate and Confirm the Assessments of All Real and Personal Property Taxes Made by the City of Sanford; Florida, Subsequent to the 23rd Day of May, 1925, Within the Boundaries of Said Municipality as Described in Chapter 11135, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1925, and to Authorize Said City of Sanford, Florida, to Collect Such of Said Taxes as Have Not Been Paid in the Manner now Provided by Law.
“Be it Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
“Section 1. That all assessments' of real and personal property taxes made by the City of Sanford, Florida, subsequent to the 23rd day of May, 1925, upon all real and personal property situate within the following described boundaries, to-wit:”
After describing the lands, Section 1 continues: “be and -the same are hereby validated, ratified and confirmed and any of such taxes which have not been paid are hereby declared to be valid and binding liens against the property upon which assessed until paid and said City of Sanford, Florida, is authorized to proceed in the manner now provided by law for the collection of said unpaid real and personal property taxes.”
“Chapter 15837.
“An Act to Ratify, Validate and Confirm all Special Assessments for Public Improvements Made by the City of Sanford, Florida, Subsequent to the 23rd day of May, 1925, Within the Boundaries' of Said Municipality as Described in Chapter 11135, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1925, *754 and to Authorize said City of Sanford, Florida, to Collect Such Special Assessments as Have not-Been Paid in the Manner Now Provided by Law.

“Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:

“Section 1.- That all special assessments for public improvements made by the City of Sanford, Florida, subsequent to the 23rd day of May, 1925, within the boundaries of said municipality as described in Chapter 11135, Laws of Florida, Acts' of 1925, be, and the same are hereby ratified, validated and confirmed and said City of Sanford, Florida, is hereby authorized to collect such special assessments as have not been paid in the manner now provided by law.”
“Chapter 15838.
“An Act to Validate and Confirm the Boundaries of the Municipality of the City of Sanford, Florida, as Des'cribed in Chapter 11135, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1925, Entitled: ‘An Act to Amend Section 6, of Chapter 9897, Laws of Florida, 1923/ Same Being an Act Entitled: ‘An Act to Abolish the Present Municipal Government of the City of Sanford, Seminole County, State of Florida, and to Organize, Incorporate and Establish a City Government for the Same, and to Prescribe the Jurisdiction, Powers and Functions of said Municipality.’ ”

There are several “whereases,” among them being:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sanford v. Major Dania, Inc.
43 So. 2d 712 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1949)
The City of Sebring v. Harder Hall, Inc.
9 So. 2d 350 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1942)
State Ex Rel. Adams v. Lee
166 So. 249 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 So. 193, 113 Fla. 750, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-landis-v-city-of-sanford-fla-1934.