Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State ex rel. Lamb v. Swisher

State ex rel. Lamb v. Swisher

3 Ohio Law. Abs. 342
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Lamb v. Swisher. Read the opinion of the Court — 112 Ohio St. 707 →
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1925·No. No. 19069·Published

Opinion

DAY, J.

Reinstatement of an employe in the classified service under Rule X, Section 10, Rules and Regulations. State Civil Service Commission, Section 486-16, General Code, relating to [343]*343absence from duty without leave for more than ten consecutive days and failure to report within ten days after revocation of leave of absence, is a matter in the sound discretion of the Civil Service Commission, with the consent of the appointing officer and unless some affirmative abuse thereof appears, a writ of mandamus to compel such reinstatement will be denied.

Writ denied.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Lamb v. Swisher, 3 Ohio Law. Abs. 342 (Ohio 1925).

3 Ohio Law. Abs. 342 (State ex rel. Lamb v. Swisher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.