State ex rel. Lagway v. Williams

2026 Ohio 1014

• Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
• Decided: March 25, 2026
• Docket: 31697
• Status: Published

Opinion

[Cite as State ex rel. Lagway v. Williams, 2026-Ohio-1014.]

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT )

STATE OF OHIO EX REL. WILLIE LAGWAY

Relator C.A. No. 31697 v.

JUDGE JAMES WILLIAMS ORIGINAL ACTION IN MANDAMUS Respondent

Dated: March 25, 2026

PER CURIAM.

{¶1} Relator, Willie Lagway, has petitioned this Court for a writ of mandamus against

Respondent, former Summit County Court of Common Pleas Judge Williams. Mr. Lagway seeks

to compel Judge Williams to correct an error in his sentencing entry or to reenter judgment to allow

Mr. Lagway to appeal his sentence. The State has moved to dismiss the petition. Mr. Lagway has

filed an amended complaint but has not responded to the motion to dismiss. For the following

reasons, this Court dismisses the petition.

{¶2} “Mandamus is a writ, issued in the name of the state to an inferior tribunal, a

corporation, board, or person, commanding the performance of an act which the law specially

enjoins as a duty resulting from an office, trust, or station.” R.C. 2731.01. When a mandamus

petitioner fails to name any party who can grant the relief he seeks in his petition, the petition is

“fatally defective” and subject to dismissal. State ex rel. Johnson v. Jensen, 2014-Ohio-3159, ¶ 5. 2

Accord State ex rel. Adams v. Winkler, 2022-Ohio-271, ¶ 10-14; State ex rel. Shepherd v. Court of

Common Pleas Ashtabula Cty., et al., 2024-Ohio-2866, ¶ 5 (11th Dist.).

{¶3} Judge Williams sentenced Mr. Lagway in 1993. Mr. Lagway seeks to compel

Judge Williams to correct an alleged error in his sentence. Alternatively, he seeks to compel the

judge to reissue his sentencing entry so that he might file a new appeal. Judge Williams is the only

respondent Mr. Lagway has named in his petition. As the State notes in its motion to dismiss,

however, Judge Williams no longer presides over Mr. Lagway’s criminal matter. Judge Williams

passed away before Mr. Lagway filed his petition. Although Mr. Lagway filed an amended

complaint after the State moved to dismiss, Judge Williams is still the only respondent named in

his amended complaint.

{¶4} Mr. Lagway’s petition “fail[s] to state a claim in mandamus because he did not

name any respondent who could grant the relief he seeks.” State ex rel. Adams at ¶ 14. Because

Judge Williams passed away before Mr. Lagway filed his petition, relief cannot be granted under

the petition filed against him. Thus, the petition is fatally defective and is dismissed on that basis.

See State ex rel. Johnson at ¶ 5; State ex rel. Shepherd at ¶ 5.

{¶5} Mr. Lagway’s petition is dismissed. Costs of this action are taxed to Mr. Lagway.

The clerk of courts is hereby directed to serve upon all parties not in default notice of this judgment

and its date of entry upon the journal. See Civ.R. 58(B).

SCOT A. STEVENSON FOR THE COURT 3

HENSAL, J. SUTTON, J. CONCUR.

APPEARANCES:

WILLIE LAGWAY, Pro Se, Relator.

ELLIOT KOLKOVICH, Prosecuting Attorney, and JENNIFER M. PIATT, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for Respondent.