State ex rel. LaFleur v. Henderson
This text of 252 So. 2d 666 (State ex rel. LaFleur v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re: Walter LaFleur applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and habeas corpus.
Application denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of either our original or supervisory jurisdiction.
is of the opinion that the-application shows on its face a right to relief. He complains of lack of counsel at the time he entered two pleas of guilty and under which he received concurrent 3 year sentences. The minutes do not show that counsel was afforded relator or waived by him. Relator has been denied a transcript [767]*767of'the evidentiary hearing below. No showing is' made in the record before" us that relator had counsel or waived counsel. We ■should review the evidentiary hearing evidence or grant the relief prayed for. I respectfully dissent from the majority disposition of the application. See dissents in State ex rel. Griffin, Walker and Williams v. Henderson, Nos. 51,757, 51,735 and 51,-741 our docket, 259 La. 731, 712, 722, 252 So.2d 445, 438, 442.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 So. 2d 666, 259 La. 766, 1971 La. LEXIS 4105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-lafleur-v-henderson-la-1971.