State Ex Rel. Labine v. Puckett

2004 WI 25, 676 N.W.2d 424, 270 Wis. 2d 57, 2004 Wisc. LEXIS 227
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided March 25, 2004·No. 02-2642-W·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

¶ 1. We dismiss the petition for review as improvidently granted.

¶ 2. Shannon Labine, an inmate at the Prairie Correctional Facility, a private facility in Minnesota, petitioned this court for review of an unpublished order of the court of appeals affirming the circuit court's denial of his request for a waiver of costs and fees. We granted review on a single issue: "Is the petitioner, who is currently serving a Wisconsin prison sentence at an out-of-state correctional facility (Prairie Correctional Facility) in Minnesota, a 'prisoner' within the meaning of Wis. Stat. § 8l4.29(lm) 1 and hence entitled to a waiver of costs and fees without first demonstrating that his underlying pleading states a claim upon which relief may be granted as required by § 814.29(1) (c)?"

¶ 3. Both Labine and the State agree that he is not a prisoner within the meaning of Wis. Stat. § 814.29(lm). Although the parties urge the Court to reach this conclusion for different reasons, we conclude that this case is moot. A decision will not affect Labine. Furthermore, the parties agree on the issue of law and *59 therefore we do not have adversarial parties. We therefore dismiss the petition for review as having been improvidently granted.

¶ 4. We set forth the facts of the case in order to place the dismissal in context. Labine filed a pro se certiorari petition in the Dane County Circuit Court seeking to challenge the decision of the Department of Corrections' Program Review Committee (PRC) to deny him a security upgrade and a transfer to a lower security facility. The circuit court, Daniel R. Moeser, Judge, denied Labine's request for a fee waiver under Wis. Stat. § 814.29(l)(c), 2 concluding that his petition stated no claim upon which it could grant relief.

¶ 5. Relying on State ex rel. Speener v. Gudmanson, 2000 WI App 78, ¶¶ 7-16, 234 Wis. 2d 461, 610 N.W.2d 136, the court of appeals concluded that an inmate not imprisoned in a Wisconsin institution is not a "prisoner" under § 801.02(7)(a)2. 3 and therefore is not *60 a prisoner under § 814.29(lm), 4 which incorporates the definition of "prisoner" appearing in § 801.02(7)(a)2. 5 The court of appeals concluded that the circuit court properly denied Labine's fee waiver request because the underlying pleading failed to state a claim.

*61 ¶ 6. Labine argues that all Wisconsin prisoners in out-of-state facilities — whether public or private — are not "prisoners" under Wis. Stat. § 814.29(lm). The State would have us conclude that Wisconsin prisoners in out-of-state private facilities are not "prisoners" under the statute and would have us withhold decision on whether Wisconsin prisoners in out-of-state public facilities are "prisoners." The parties agree that the interpretation of the statutory definition of "prisoner" will have significant consequences for the application of the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 1997 Wis. Act 133, which created §§ 801.02(7)(a) and 814.29(lm), although neither of the parties' briefs discusses those consequences in great depth.

¶ 7. We agree with the parties that the determination of who is a "prisoner" under the PLRA is an important question of statutory interpretation. Therefore, we conclude that we should address that question when it is before this court in a case with adversary parties and with full briefing of the consequences of any statutory interpretation.

¶ 8. Accordingly we conclude that review in this case was improvidently granted, and we dismiss the petition for review.

By the Court. — Review of the decision of the court of appeals is dismissed.

¶ 9. DIANE S. SYKES, J., and PATIENCE D. ROGGENSACK, J., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Labine v. Puckett, 2004 WI 25, 676 N.W.2d 424, 270 Wis. 2d 57, 2004 Wisc. LEXIS 227 (Wis. 2004).

2004 WI 25 (State Ex Rel. Labine v. Puckett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County
2004 WI 58 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2004)