State ex rel. Koster v. Martin

Missouri Court of Appeals

State ex rel. Koster v. Martin

456 S.W.3d 886, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 294, 2015 WL 1246521

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 17, 2015·No. WD 77240·Published

Opinion

Per curiam:

Samuel D. Martin’s inmate account is currently subject to the Missouri Incarceration Reimbursement Act. He seeks to set aside the original judgment as void under Rule 74.06(b)(4). The trial court held that jurisdiction was proper in the original judgment and that adequate due process was afforded. Martin brings this appeal to challenge the trial court’s denial of his motion to set aside the previous judgment. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam:

Samuel D. Martin’s inmate account is currently subject to the Missouri Incarceration Reimbursement Act. He seeks to set aside the original judgment as void under Rule 74.06(b)(4). The trial court held that jurisdiction was proper in the original judgment and that adequate due process was afforded. Martin brings this appeal to challenge the trial court’s denial of his motion to set aside the previous judgment. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

State ex rel. Koster v. Martin, 456 S.W.3d 886, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 294, 2015 WL 1246521 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

456 S.W.3d 886 (State ex rel. Koster v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.