State ex rel. Koch v. Industrial Commission

591 N.E.2d 238, 63 Ohio St. 3d 747
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 3, 1992·No. No. 91-15·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Our review of the record indicates that claimant did not seek administrative rehearing of the commission’s order as permitted by Ohio Adm.Code 4121-3-20(G). As a general rule, failure to exhaust available administrative remedies precludes issuance of a writ of mandamus in a VSSR action. State, ex rel. Bailey, v. Indus. Comm. (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 191, 580 N.E.2d, 1081. Cf. State, ex rel. Cotterman, v. St. Marys Foundry (1989), 46 Ohio St.3d 42, 544 N.E.2d 887.

For this reason, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Koch v. Industrial Commission, 591 N.E.2d 238, 63 Ohio St. 3d 747 (Ohio 1992).

591 N.E.2d 238 (State ex rel. Koch v. Industrial Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Koch v. Indus. Comm.
594 N.E.2d 973 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1992)