State ex rel. Kober v. District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial District

410 P.2d 945, 147 Mont. 116, 1966 Mont. LEXIS 361
CourtMontana Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 31, 1966
DocketNo. 11075
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 410 P.2d 945 (State ex rel. Kober v. District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Kober v. District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial District, 410 P.2d 945, 147 Mont. 116, 1966 Mont. LEXIS 361 (Mo. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

On January 21, 1966, petitioners filed an application for writ of supervisory control and following an ex parte hearing [117]*117on that date an order to show canse was issued, returnable at the hour of 10:00 o’clock A.M., on January 31, 1966. On the return day, respondents filed their answer and therein as a third defense alleged: “The petitioners have an adequate remedy by appeal and, therefore, their application for writ of supervisory control should be denied.”

The basis for the application is the entry of a summary judgment in favor of one of the defendants in a civil negligence action under Eule 54(b), M.E.Civ.P., appealable under Eule 1, M.E.App.Civ.P. Petitioners contend the remedy by appeal is inadequate because of the advanced age of the ward of plaintiffs, the length of time the litigation has been pending without trial, the fact that trial could be had in the immediate future if petitioners were not required to follow the appeal procedures, and that no trial can be fairly and intelligently had without presence of the defendant dismissed from the action by virtue of the summary judgment.

The Montana Eules of Appellate Civil Procedure provide in Eule 9(a): “Composition of the Record on Appeal. The original papers and exhibits filed in the district court, the transcript of proceedings, if any, and a certified copy of the docket entries prepared by the clerk of the district court shall constitute the record on appeal in all cases.”

We are advised that no testimony was taken in the district court hearing, and the other requirements for the record are immediately available. An appeal could be taken forthwith and unless counsel desire additional time for briefing such appeal could be submitted upon the briefs filed in this original proceeding.

In view of the provisions of the Montana Eules of Appellate Civil Procedure for the expeditious handling of appeals we are not inclined to issue writs of supervisory control as a method of short cut appeal, except under the most extenuating circumstances which we need not attempt to catalog. In this cause no such circumstances appear.

The writ requested is denied and the proceeding is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Ward v. Schmall
617 P.2d 140 (Montana Supreme Court, 1980)
Crist v. Boyd
560 P.2d 531 (Montana Supreme Court, 1976)
State Ex Rel. Thelen v. City of Missoula
543 P.2d 173 (Montana Supreme Court, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
410 P.2d 945, 147 Mont. 116, 1966 Mont. LEXIS 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-kober-v-district-court-of-the-thirteenth-judicial-district-mont-1966.