State ex rel. Klink v. Eyrich
This text of 157 Ohio St. (N.S.) 338 (State ex rel. Klink v. Eyrich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The instant action originated in this court by relator filing a “petition for writ of prohihi[339]*339tion or mandamus. ’ ’ The petition alleges that Schorr is not a qualified elector of Hamilton county and that “without good and sufficient reasons, respondents have failed, neglected and refused to cause said Ed D. Schorr to be disqualified as a candidate for a delegate and propose to place his name on said ballot for the May 6, 1952, primary election.” The prayer of the petition is for a “writ of prohibition or mandamus” prohibiting respondents from placing such candidate’s name on the ballot.
The record of the hearing before the board discloses substantial evidence supporting the finding of the board, and such finding will not be disturbed by this court.
The writ is denied.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
157 Ohio St. (N.S.) 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-klink-v-eyrich-ohio-1952.