State ex rel. Kline v. Crow

679 N.E.2d 307, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1510, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 1614
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 28, 1997
Docket97-477
StatusPublished

This text of 679 N.E.2d 307 (State ex rel. Kline v. Crow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Kline v. Crow, 679 N.E.2d 307, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1510, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 1614 (Ohio 1997).

Opinion

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss of Jack Dennin, motion to dismiss of Frederick W. Crow III, and motion to strike motion to dismiss of Frederick Crow. Motions to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents, would grant the writ of mandamus, and would order the return of the tapes.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
679 N.E.2d 307, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1510, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 1614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-kline-v-crow-ohio-1997.