State ex rel. Kirtz v. Corrigan

546 N.E.2d 1327, 47 Ohio St. 3d 45, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 296

Opinion

Upon review of the matter presented to us, we find that appellant, Russell R. Kirtz, has stated a claim for relief. The judgment of the court of appeals dismissing appellant’s complaint in mandamus is reversed and this cause is remanded to that court for further proceedings.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.