State ex rel. Kirtz v. Corrigan
546 N.E.2d 1327, 47 Ohio St. 3d 45, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 296
This text of 546 N.E.2d 1327 (State ex rel. Kirtz v. Corrigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State ex rel. Kirtz v. Corrigan, 546 N.E.2d 1327, 47 Ohio St. 3d 45, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 296 (Ohio 1989).
Opinion
Upon review of the matter presented to us, we find that appellant, Russell R. Kirtz, has stated a claim for relief. The judgment of the court of appeals dismissing appellant’s complaint in mandamus is reversed and this cause is remanded to that court for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State ex rel. Kirtz v. Corrigan
575 N.E.2d 186 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1991)
State ex rel. Kirtz v. Corrigan
3 Ohio App. Unrep. 201 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1990)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
546 N.E.2d 1327, 47 Ohio St. 3d 45, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-kirtz-v-corrigan-ohio-1989.