State ex rel. King v. State
This text of 578 So. 2d 936 (State ex rel. King v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re King, Andrew; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 3-73-3516.
The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of documents he has filed on or about February 28, 1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
578 So. 2d 936, 1991 La. LEXIS 1380, 1991 WL 74891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-king-v-state-la-1991.