State ex rel. King v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. King v. State

578 So. 2d 936, 1991 La. LEXIS 1380, 1991 WL 74891

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 7, 1991·No. No. 91-KH-0934·Published

Opinion

In re King, Andrew; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 3-73-3516.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of documents he has filed on or about February 28, 1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re King, Andrew; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 3-73-3516.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of documents he has filed on or about February 28, 1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

State ex rel. King v. State, 578 So. 2d 936, 1991 La. LEXIS 1380, 1991 WL 74891 (La. 1991).

Pincite

578 So. 2d 936 (State ex rel. King v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.