State ex rel. King v. Ohio Dept. of Taxation

852 N.E.2d 184, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1433
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 2, 2006·No. 2006-0977·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus. On respondents’ motions to dismiss and relator’s motion for leave to amend complaint pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. VIII(7) and Civ.R. 15(A). Motion to dismiss granted. Motion for leave to amend denied as moot. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. King v. Ohio Dept. of Taxation, 852 N.E.2d 184, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1433 (Ohio 2006).

852 N.E.2d 184 (State ex rel. King v. Ohio Dept. of Taxation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.