State ex rel. King v. Holbrook

852 N.E.2d 184, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1433

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 2, 2006·No. 2006-0887·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus. On motion for summary judgment. On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination, cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. King v. Holbrook, 852 N.E.2d 184, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1433 (Ohio 2006).

Pincite

852 N.E.2d 184 (State ex rel. King v. Holbrook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.