State ex rel. King v. Boyko

828 N.E.2d 114, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1557

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 25, 2005·No. 2005-0579·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus. On answer and motion for summary judgment of respondent. On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination, cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnicic, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. King v. Boyko, 828 N.E.2d 114, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1557 (Ohio 2005).

Pincite

828 N.E.2d 114 (State ex rel. King v. Boyko) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.