Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State ex rel. Kinast v. Forchione

State ex rel. Kinast v. Forchione

986 N.E.2d 26, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1409
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 24, 2013
Docket2013-0159
StatusPublished

This text of 986 N.E.2d 26 (State ex rel. Kinast v. Forchione) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Kinast v. Forchione, 986 N.E.2d 26, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1409 (Ohio 2013).

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On motion to dismiss. Motion granted. Motion for protective order and motions to quash denied as moot. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, and French, JJ., concur. O’Neill, J., dissents and would grant an alternative writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
986 N.E.2d 26, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-kinast-v-forchione-ohio-2013.