State ex rel. Kinast v. Forchione

986 N.E.2d 26, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1409
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 24, 2013·No. 2013-0159·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On motion to dismiss. Motion granted. Motion for protective order and motions to quash denied as moot. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, and French, JJ., concur. O’Neill, J., dissents and would grant an alternative writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Kinast v. Forchione, 986 N.E.2d 26, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1409 (Ohio 2013).

986 N.E.2d 26 (State ex rel. Kinast v. Forchione) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.