State Ex Rel. Kilburn v. Patterson
This text of 3 S.E. 491 (State Ex Rel. Kilburn v. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case is substantially like that of Gatling v. Boone, decided at the present term, and must be governed by it.
The second ground of demurrer assigned is, that the complaint does not allege specifically in what respects the Board of County Canvassers erred in rejecting the returns from certain voting places mentioned. Such allegations were not. necessary, because the decision of the Board was not conclusive, and the purpose of this action is not to have the Court below, as a court of errors, correct particular errors of the-Board, but to ascertain and determine the result of the elec *594 tion in question, and whether the relator was elected, as he alleges he was, and if so, to require that he be inducted into the office, according to law.
There is no error, and the judgment must be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 S.E. 491, 98 N.C. 593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-kilburn-v-patterson-nc-1887.