State Ex Rel. Keville v. Faurot

186 N.E. 718, 126 Ohio St. 646, 126 Ohio St. (N.S.) 646, 1933 Ohio LEXIS 360
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 31, 1933·No. 24168·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed, for the reason that such court did not err in refusing to order the city commission to pass an ordinance dividing the city into wards; nor did the Court of Appeals err in refusing to order the city commission to pass an ordinance in the matter of salaries, there being a suit pending relating thereto in the common pleas eourt, begun prior to the filing of the petition in this case; nor is there error in the matter of the certificate to the Secretary of State, this question now being moot; nor did the Court of Appeals err in declining to allow attorneys fees, the judgment not being in favor of the taxpayer.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Allen, Stephenson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Keville v. Faurot, 186 N.E. 718, 126 Ohio St. 646, 126 Ohio St. (N.S.) 646, 1933 Ohio LEXIS 360 (Ohio 1933).

186 N.E. 718 (State Ex Rel. Keville v. Faurot) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Kurtz v. Bliss
70 N.E.2d 653 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1946)
State Ex Rel. First National Bank v. Village of Botkins
48 N.E.2d 865 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1943)