State ex rel. Kesterson v. Kent State Univ.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Kesterson v. Kent State Univ.

2017 Ohio 8136, 150 Ohio St. 3d 1449

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 11, 2017

Docket2016-0615

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 Ohio 8136 (State ex rel. Kesterson v. Kent State Univ.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Kesterson v. Kent State Univ., 2017 Ohio 8136, 150 Ohio St. 3d 1449 (Ohio 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus. Sua sponte, an alternative writ is granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.05: parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days; relator shall file a brief within 10 days after the filing of the evidence; respondent shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 7 days after the filing of respondent’s brief.

Kent State University shall file, under seal, copies of the unredacted documents at issue in this case at the time of the filing of the evidence.

Respondent’s motion to dismiss is denied. O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. Sua sponte, an alternative writ is granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.05: parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days; relator shall file a brief within 10 days after the filing of the evidence; respondent shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 7 days after the filing of respondent’s brief.

Kent State University shall file, under seal, copies of the unredacted documents at issue in this case at the time of the filing of the evidence.

Respondent’s motion to dismiss is denied. O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 Ohio 8136, 150 Ohio St. 3d 1449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-kesterson-v-kent-state-univ-ohio-2017.