State ex rel. Kellogg v. Sullivan

44 Kan. 43
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided May 15, 1890·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Gjreen, G.:

This is an original action commenced in this court by the attorney general, in the name of the state, to compel the defendants, who are county officers of Grant county, to remove their offices from the city of Ulysses to Appomattox, on the ground that the latter place received a majority of the legal votes cast at an election held in said county, for the permanent location of the county seat, on the 16th day of October, 1888. The pleadings show in this case that the county of Grant was duly organized and apportioned into five townships, in which election precincts were designated in each township, said townships being named respectively, Lincoln, Sherman, Sheridan, Howard, and Thomas; that Ulysses was the temporary county seat; that on the 16th day of October, 1888, an election was held in each of the precincts in said county, for the election of certain county and township officers and for the permanent location of the county seat of said county; that returns were duly made to the board of county commissioners, and on the 19th day of October, 1888, said returns were canvassed, with the following result, as to the location of the county seat, in each of the townships named:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Kellogg v. Sullivan, 44 Kan. 43 (kan 1890).

44 Kan. 43 (State ex rel. Kellogg v. Sullivan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Beck v. Board of County Commissioners
57 P.2d 450 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1936)
Martin v. McGarr
1910 OK 278 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1910)