State ex rel. Keebler Co. v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Keebler Co. v. Indus. Comm.

1998 Ohio 59, 83 Ohio St. 3d 367

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 14, 1998

Docket1997-1894

StatusPublished

This text of 1998 Ohio 59 (State ex rel. Keebler Co. v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Keebler Co. v. Indus. Comm., 1998 Ohio 59, 83 Ohio St. 3d 367 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 367.]

THE STATE EX REL. KEEBLER COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Keebler Co. v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-59.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 97-1894—Submitted August 19, 1998—Decided October 14, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 96APD09-1267. __________________ Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, Samuel M. Duran and Cynthia C. Felson, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Craigg E. Gould, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. Young, Reverman & Napier Co., L.P.A., Martin M. Young and Stephen S. Mazzei, for appellee Gladys Carter. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 367.]

THE STATE EX REL. KEEBLER COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Keebler Co. v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-59.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 97-1894—Submitted August 19, 1998—Decided October 14, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 96APD09-1267. __________________ Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, Samuel M. Duran and Cynthia C. Felson, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Craigg E. Gould, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. Young, Reverman & Napier Co., L.P.A., Martin M. Young and Stephen S. Mazzei, for appellee Gladys Carter. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1998 Ohio 59, 83 Ohio St. 3d 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-keebler-co-v-indus-comm-ohio-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack