State ex rel. Kay v. McMahon
206 N.E.2d 560, 2 Ohio St. 2d 106, 31 Ohio Op. 2d 150, 1965 Ohio LEXIS 495
Opinion
The Court of Common Pleas has jurisdiction of the person of relator and of the subject matter of the pending criminal action. The question here presented is for the determination of that court when properly presented.
A writ of prohibition will not be awarded to prevent an anticipated erroneous judgment. The relator has an adequate remedy at law by way of appeal from any determination of the trial court unfavorable to him.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Kay v. McMahon, 206 N.E.2d 560, 2 Ohio St. 2d 106, 31 Ohio Op. 2d 150, 1965 Ohio LEXIS 495 (Ohio 1965).
206 N.E.2d 560 (State ex rel. Kay v. McMahon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.