State ex rel. Kay v. Lausche

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Kay v. Lausche

161 Ohio St. (N.S.) 168

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 10, 1954

DocketNo. 33774

StatusPublished

This text of 161 Ohio St. (N.S.) 168 (State ex rel. Kay v. Lausche) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Kay v. Lausche, 161 Ohio St. (N.S.) 168 (Ohio 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The respondent has performed his mandatory duty by ordering that a special election bo held and by setting a time therefor. The time for holding such election is discretionary with the Governor, and that discretion is not subject to judicial control in the absence of an abuse thereof. State, ex rel. Armstrong, v. Davey, Governor, 130 Ohio St., 160, 198 N. E., 180.

[169]*169The motion for judgment is allowed and a writ is denied.

Writ denied.

Weygandt, C. J., Middleton, Taet, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart and Lamneck, J'J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI