State ex rel. Kay v. Lausche

161 Ohio St. (N.S.) 168
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 10, 1954·No. No. 33774·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The respondent has performed his mandatory duty by ordering that a special election bo held and by setting a time therefor. The time for holding such election is discretionary with the Governor, and that discretion is not subject to judicial control in the absence of an abuse thereof. State, ex rel. Armstrong, v. Davey, Governor, 130 Ohio St., 160, 198 N. E., 180.

[169] The motion for judgment is allowed and a writ is denied.

Writ denied.

Weygandt, C. J., Middleton, Taet, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart and Lamneck, J'J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Kay v. Lausche, 161 Ohio St. (N.S.) 168 (Ohio 1954).

161 Ohio St. (N.S.) 168 (State ex rel. Kay v. Lausche) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Armstrong v. Davey
198 N.E. 182 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1935)