State ex rel. Katz v. Walter

Ohio Court of Appeals

State ex rel. Katz v. Walter

12 Ohio Law. Abs. 152, 1931 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1145

DecidedOctober 23, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 12 Ohio Law. Abs. 152 (State ex rel. Katz v. Walter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Katz v. Walter, 12 Ohio Law. Abs. 152, 1931 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1145 (Ohio Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

HORNBECK, J.

Submitted on motion of respondent to dismiss the appeal for the reason that this court is without jurisdiction.

Memo is submitted with the motion to which, upon submission of the motion on the 7th of October, counsel for relator took leave to file answer brief within one day, if desired. Such brief has not been provided.

Upon the law of the case, we sustain the motion. There seems to be no doubt that the action of mandamus in Ohio is at law and not in chancery, therefore, under Article 4, §6, of the Constitution of Ohio, is not appealable.

State ex Carson v Board of Education, 115 Oh St 55, 152 NE 646;

State ex Welch v Deneen, 7 Oh Ap 117, 28 O. C. A. 543, 38 O. C. C. 652;

State ex Davis v Butler County, 9 Oh Ap 299;

State ex Franke v Minshall, 10 Oh Ap 86, 2 Ohio Jur., Par. 97.

ALLREAD, PJ, and KUNKXE, J, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI