State ex rel. Karasek v. Moyer

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Karasek v. Moyer

672 N.E.2d 1119, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1462, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2367

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 4, 1996

Docket96-2630

StatusPublished

This text of 672 N.E.2d 1119 (State ex rel. Karasek v. Moyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Karasek v. Moyer, 672 N.E.2d 1119, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1462, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2367 (Ohio 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s request for stay of ruling on affidavit of disqualification and of trial court proceedings,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Douglas, Acting C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s request for stay of ruling on affidavit of disqualification and of trial court proceedings,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Douglas, Acting C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

672 N.E.2d 1119, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1462, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-karasek-v-moyer-ohio-1996.