State ex rel. K-Mart Corp. v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. K-Mart Corp. v. Indus. Comm.

1998 Ohio 159, 83 Ohio St. 3d 130

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 16, 1998

Docket1996-2312

StatusPublished

This text of 1998 Ohio 159 (State ex rel. K-Mart Corp. v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. K-Mart Corp. v. Indus. Comm., 1998 Ohio 159, 83 Ohio St. 3d 130 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 130.]

THE STATE EX REL. K-MART CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. K-Mart Corp. v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-159.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 96-2312—Submitted July 8, 1998—Decided September 16, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD09-1124. __________________ Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, L.P.A., and Robert C. Meyer, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Laurel Blum Mazorow, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. M. Blake Stone Co., L.P.A., and F. Christopher Oehl, for appellee Virginia Faber. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 130.]

THE STATE EX REL. K-MART CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. K-Mart Corp. v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-159.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 96-2312—Submitted July 8, 1998—Decided September 16, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD09-1124. __________________ Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, L.P.A., and Robert C. Meyer, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Laurel Blum Mazorow, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. M. Blake Stone Co., L.P.A., and F. Christopher Oehl, for appellee Virginia Faber. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1998 Ohio 159, 83 Ohio St. 3d 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-k-mart-corp-v-indus-comm-ohio-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack