State ex rel. Juvenille Department v. K. M.-R.

160 P.3d 994, 213 Or. App. 275, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 807
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided June 6, 2007·No. 041135J; A129609·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Youth appeals an order placing her in the legal custody of the Oregon Youth Authority, raising two assignments of error. We reject without discussion youth’s argument that the court lacked authority to place her in the legal custody of the Oregon Youth Authority for any period longer than six months. Youth is correct, however, in her argument that the court erred by failing to make written findings pursuant to ORS 419C.478(1). See State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. C. N. W., 212 Or App 551, 159 P3d 333 (2007). We therefore remand this case to the juvenile court with instructions to include in the order such written findings as it deems appropriate.

Vacated and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Juvenille Department v. K. M.-R., 160 P.3d 994, 213 Or. App. 275, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 807 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

160 P.3d 994 (State ex rel. Juvenille Department v. K. M.-R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. D. B. O.
529 P.3d 1004 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2023)
State v. M. A. S.
462 P.3d 284 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2020)
State v. J. R. C. (In re J. R. C.)
412 P.3d 1201 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2018)
State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. J. J.
208 P.3d 1054 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)
In Matter of JJ
208 P.3d 1054 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)
In the Matter of Km-R.
160 P.3d 994 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2007)