State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. W.

559 P.2d 528, 28 Or. App. 289, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 2619
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided January 31, 1977·No. No. 57,387, CA 6782·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this juvenile proceeding the minor seeks a reversal of the finding that he was within the jurisdiction of the court by virtue of having committed manslaughter. Relying upon our duty to review de novo, his sole contention is that, contrary to the trial judge’s finding, he did not use force beyond that necessary to defend himself. Determination of this issue necessarily involves determining the state of mind of the juvenile at the crucial time. As is the case with regard to credibility, such a determination must be, in large part, made on the basis of the impression made by the witness. Thus, in this type of situation, as in State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. H., 28 Or App 75, 558 P2d 856 (1977), we give great weight to the trial judge who sees and hears witnesses.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. W., 559 P.2d 528, 28 Or. App. 289, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 2619 (Or. Ct. App. 1977).

559 P.2d 528 (State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. W.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Juvenile Dept of Multnomah v. H.
558 P.2d 856 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1977)